Unconditional Positive Regard - Are We Helping or Harming Our Clients?
When most people think of talk therapy, they likely conjure up thoughts about Carl Rogers’ non-directive, humanistic approach. This is what my brother refers to when he suggests that as a psychologist, I just repeat back what clients say to me…Essentially, unconditional positive regard involves “showing complete support and acceptance of a person no matter what that person says or does.”
On one
hand, I totally agree and very much identify as a humanistic psychologist
because I am accepting and supportive of my clients regardless of what they say
or do. I think this gets tricky, however, in what this actually looks like in
therapy. As a graduate student, I took this to mean listening with empathy and
remaining as much of a “blank slate” as possible.
I now
understand this to mean continuing to be empathic, but also providing feedback about
how I feel while interacting with clients. The interpersonal process approach
to therapy suggests that whatever is happening in the therapy room is also
happening with others outside of therapy.
I did
not randomly choose to utilize interpersonal process as my approach to therapy
with clients who have eating disorders – I actually researched this as a graduate
student. I constantly studied attachment, relationship behaviors, and
perfectionism as predictors of disordered eating. Anecdotally, I also noticed
these themes consistently in eating disorder support and treatment groups.
Relationships
are extremely complicated, inevitably involve conflict/misunderstandings/misinterpretations,
and are not perfect. If we as therapist provide the type of unconditional
positive regard that reflects only empathizing without providing feedback, are
we really helping clients? Is this how other people are going to treat them or
are they going to continuously experience dysfunctional relationships outside
of therapy?
We have,
in my opinion, a unique opportunity to provide a context for the client to
understand their way of relating to others through their relationships with us
as therapists. I can accept them as they are, but also provide an opportunity
for mirroring, attunement, and mutual understanding if we discuss how themes in
their behaviors with others are reflected in their relationship with me. This
also provides an opportunity to evaluate how one person’s feelings and
experiences do not invalidate the feelings and experiences of another.
Interpersonal process therapy provides an opportunity to model how
relationships are not perfect, and that rupture and repair can actually deepen
the relationship between two people.
I
personally feel it could be problematic to provide exclusively positive,
supportive feedback because it reinforces a few problematic schemas: such as the
beliefs that (1) individuals in a position of power or with certain credentials
are “perfect,” or (2) the way the client is relating (whether it is
distancing, idealizing, devaluing, approval seeking, etc) is productive.
Also, I
think this is where acceptance and commitment therapy blends beautifully with
interpersonal process therapy because it’s an opportunity to demonstrate the
importance of the ACT principle that: seeking out pleasure often involves
facing at least a possibility if not a reality of experiencing pain.
It is
not comfortable, even as a therapist, to muddle around in the messiness of
sorting out differences in thoughts, feelings, and perspectives between myself
and clients – so again, this becomes modeling how to utilize commitment to the
value of the relationship as a way to calmly address anxiety that arises from
differences in opinions, thoughts, feelings, and understandings.
When
individuals sit in therapy and talk about issues that bother them outside of
therapy, it is helpful because it provides a context for understanding themes
and struggles in their lives. In order for change to occur, however, I believe
it is necessary to provide a here-and-now experience where anxiety is
hightened, an alternative approach demonstrates flexibility and teaches new
skills, and commitment to an overall value is reinforced.
This is where my positive psychology approach comes in…I
don’t think we overcome disordered eating, alcoholism, anxiety, depression, or
any other mental health issue by focusing on the problem….When we find
something that matters more than what we are avoiding – this is where recovery
starts….
Now that
I’m in private practice, I don’t have colleagues to discuss my theory of
counseling with on a daily basis – so this blog has become my new sounding board….Also,
maybe I miss grad school a bit – I always enjoyed conversations about theory
and the human condition….
Comments
Post a Comment